โรงเรียนประถมศึกษาขนาดเล็ก: อนาคตที่ต้องตัดสินใจ

Sasiton  Phichi; Sumit Suwan; Patcharapa Tantichuwet

doi:10.64186/jsp3248

Authors

Sasiton Phichi Faculty of Education and Development Sciences Kasetsart University Kamphaeng Saen Campus
Sumit Suwan Faculty of Education and Development Sciences Kasetsart University Kamphaeng Saen Campus
Patcharapa Tantichuwet Faculty of Education and Development Sciences Kasetsart University Kamphaeng Saen Campus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64186/jsp3248%20

Keywords:

Small Primary Schools , Future at the Crossroads , Policy Decisions

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the context, current conditions, and transformative trends of Small Primary Schools within the landscape of global educational shifts. These changes have inevitably impacted the Thai educational system, particularly affecting small-scale primary institutions that serve as the backbone of rural education. These schools are currently grappling with severe constraints in resources, budgeting, and personnel, alongside the persistent challenge of multigrade instruction due to incomplete teaching staff. Furthermore, existing educational policies have proven insufficiently agile to respond to the rapid fluctuations in the school-age population. This study positions the Future at the Crossroads for these institutions, presenting a critical juncture where stakeholders must decide between maintaining status quo, dissolution, or transferring jurisdiction to Local Administrative Organizations with greater capacity and readiness. By scrutinizing the structural impediments of small primary schools, this article underscores the imperative for strategic Policy Decisions characterized by flexibility and alignment with local contexts. Such a paradigm shift is essential to mitigating educational inequality, fostering social justice, and enhancing the quality of education, ultimately securing genuine long-term sustainability for learners in the modern era.

References

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309.

Darmody, M., Smyth, E., & Russell, H. (2021). Impacts of the COVID-19 control measures on widening educational inequalities. Young, 29(4), 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/11033088211027412

Gruenewald, D. A., & Smith, G. A. (2008). Place-based education in the global age: Local diversity. Routledge.

Ministry of Education. (1999). National Education Act B.E. 2542 (1999) and amendments. Teachers’ Council of Thailand Press.

Ministry of Education. (2025). Educational information system. https://www.moe.go.th

OECD. (2019). The OECD learning compass 2030: A framework for future-oriented learning. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2025). Educational information system. https://www.moe.go.th

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2025). Annual operational plan for fiscal year 2025. https://www.bopp.go.th

Office of the Education Council. (2021). Future skills for developing the quality of Thai people of all ages to cope with rapid global disruption in the 21st century: Research findings and promotion guidelines.

Office of the Education Council. (2022). Directions and trends of educational management in the COVID-19 era. Pimdee Publishing.

Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2022). Goal 12: Ensuring sustainable consumption and production patterns.

Office of the Secretary-General, National Reform Steering Assembly. (2016). Reforming the learning system to develop Thai citizens to be good, disciplined, responsible to family, community, society, and nation. https://prt.parliament.go.th

Osborne, S. P. (2018). From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: Are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation? Public Management Review, 20(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1350461

Phakawatana, W., Suwan, S., & Tantichuwech, P. (2025). Small schools: Problems and challenges in the modern world. Journal of Social Studies Perspectives, 1(6), 1–13.

Raggl, A. (2019). Small rural schools in Austria: Potentials and challenges. In A. Raggl, T. Sturm, & A. Kerle (Eds.), Small schools and the challenges of globalization (pp. 195–213). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18799-6_12

Sricharoen, U., & Wannaphaero, S. (2025). Management of small schools based on the concept of schools as learning communities. Journal of Social Studies Perspectives, 2(1), 1–14.

Suwan, S., Wannaketketsiri, T., Khruea-in, N., Fakcharoenphon, W., Nukooltham, K., Sroikhiri, T., & Chaonafang, S. (2017). Mobilization of the multi-lateral cooperation to improve educational quality of small-size schools in Nakhon Pathom Province. Thailand Research Fund (TRF).

Thodla, S. (2023). Small-sized schools: Challenges and opportunities in educational management. Kurusapa Journal, 17(2), 67–76.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2019). World population prospects 2019 (ST/ESA/SER.A/423). United Nations. https://population.un.org/wpp/

World Bank. (2024). Thailand learning poverty brief. World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099090524093027254