AN INNOVATION FOR ENHANCING COMPUTATIONAL THINKING SKILLS THROUGH UNPLUGGED ACTIVITIES USING A BYTEBOARD EMBEDDED SYSTEM KIT FOR CHILDREN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64186/jsp3241Keywords:
Computational Thinking , Unplugged Activities , ByteBoard Embedded System KitAbstract
This academic article aims to propose an instructional approach for enhancing computational thinking skills among children aged 8–12 years (upper primary level). The approach integrates unplugged activities with a ByteBoard kit designed as an embedded system platform, transforming abstract computer science concepts into tangible learning experiences.
The proposed learning process consists of seven key stages: (1) Ignite (inspiration), (2) Understand (problem identification and comprehension), (3) Design (solution planning), (4) Act (hands-on implementation), (5) Iterate (testing and improvement), (6) Reflect (feedback consideration and knowledge connection), and (7) Extend (learning expansion). These stages were synthesized to create a structured yet flexible framework that supports active and meaningful learning. Findings from the synthesis indicate that this innovation, combining unplugged activities with the ByteBoard platform, goes beyond introducing basic programming skills. It serves as a critical tool for establishing systematic problem-solving abilities. Specifically, it supports the development of four core components of computational thinking: decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithmic design. The study further highlights that such a learning approach enables learners to transfer knowledge from logical thinking processes to real-world applications in a concrete manner. By engaging in experiential and hands-on activities, learners are better equipped to internalize concepts and apply them effectively in diverse contexts. The author expects that the proposed framework will contribute to the cultivation of computational thinking as a foundational competency for digital citizenship. Ultimately, this approach aims to empower learners with the skills necessary to innovate, adapt, and respond effectively to future challenges in an increasingly complex and technology-driven world, while supporting sustainable development in education.
References
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing
computational thinking in compulsory education: Implications for policy and practice.
European Commission, Joint Research Centre.
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development
of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American
Educational Research Association.
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.
Chotikunphat, P. (2025). Effects of unplugged coding learning experiences on computational
thinking skills of early childhood children. Journal of Pitchaya Education and Research,
(1), 9–16. Retrieved from https://so16.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JPER/article/view/2950
Dag, F., Erarslan, A., & Durak, H. Y. (2023). Unplugged vs. plugged-in: A comparison of
computational thinking development. Journal of Educational Computing Research,
(2), 432–458.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
International Society for Technology in Education [ISTE], & Computer Science Teachers
Association [CSTA]. (2011). Operational definition of computational thinking for K–12
education.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal
of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2–10.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.
Prentice Hall.
NamSai, K., Songoopakan, T., Rattanaphan, T., & Chotikijphiwat, S. (2025). Development of
unplugged game-based learning activities to enhance logical reasoning skills in problem
solving for Grade 5 students at Huasai School (Ruenprachaban). Journal of Education,
Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University, 3(2), e0929. Retrieved from https://so16.tci-
haijo.org/index.php/EJ-NSTRU/article/view/929
National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA). (2022). KidBright: An
embedded system platform for learning computational science. Retrieved from
https://www.nstda.or.th/archives/kidbright-3/
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1992). Transfer of learning. In International encyclopedia of
education (2nd ed.). Pergamon Press.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.
Phongpianchan, P. (2019). Unplugged activities: An approach to computer science learning
management in primary education. Journal of Educational Technology.
Resnick, M. (2017). Lifelong kindergarten: Cultivating creativity through projects, passion, peers,
and play. MIT Press.
Sammaviriya, B., & Saphrueksri, S. (2024). Development of unplugged coding learning activities
combined with problem-based learning to enhance logical reasoning skills of
kindergarten level 2 students. Silpakorn Educational Research Journal, 16(2), 69–86.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Tan-a-ram, P., et al. (2022). KidBright: An open-source embedded education platform for
enhancing computational thinking. Sustainability, 14(12), 7321.
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Yaiwong, P., & Onthanee, A. (2023). Development of unplugged coding game packages to
promote computational thinking skills for lower primary students. Journal of Learning
Innovation and Technology, 3(1), 25–34.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of social studies perspectives
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, which allows others to share the article while giving appropriate credit to the author. It prohibits the use of the article for commercial purposes or the creation of derivative works. Any other reuse or reproduction requires permission from the journal.
