AI Competency Development Guidelines for Educational Management at Rajabhat Ratanakosin Group Universities in Bangkok
Keywords:
AI Competency, Educational Management, Rajabhat UniversityAbstract
This research aimed to investigate the characteristics, components, and present guidelines for developing AI competency for educational management at Rajabhat Ratanakosin Group Universities in Bangkok. A mixed-methods research approach was employed, with the research process consisting of four steps: 1) Studying the characteristics through document analysis and in-depth interviews with 12 administrators, 2) Analyzing the components based on surveys from 558 sampled administrators, lecturers, and personnel, obtained through multi-stage random sampling, 3) Verifying the components using data triangulation methodology, and 4) Presenting guidelines for AI competency development through a connoisseurship involving 9 experts, selected purposively. Research instruments included structured interview forms, questionnaires, and focus group discussion guides. Qualitative data were analyzed using descriptive content analysis, while quantitative data were analyzed by exploring components and indicators.
The research findings indicate that: 1) The characteristics of AI competency for educational management at Rajabhat Ratanakosin Group Universities in Bangkok, consisted of 3 aspects: (1) AI literacy, (2) the use of and problem-solving with AI tools, and (3) adaptation to AI changes; 2) the core components of AI competency were: (1) Cognitive domain, (2) Psychomotor domain, and (3) Affective domain. The sub-components were: (1) Computer and AI fundamentals, (2) AI access, (3) AI usage, (4) AI media production and creation, (5) AI communication, (6) AI media management, and (7) AI evaluation; and 3) the development guidelines included 5 methods: (1) self-directed learning and development, (2) online learning, (3) using case studies, (4) learning through AI, and (5) practical workshops. The development process could be implemented using the ASIMI process.
Downloads
References
Aad, S., & Hardey, M. (2025). Generative AI: Hopes, controversies and the future of faculty roles in education. Quality Assurance in Education, 33(2), 267-282.
Jafari, F., & Keykha, A. (2024). Identifying the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in higher education: A qualitative study. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(4), 1228-1245.
Kang, H. (2023). Artificial intelligence and its influence in adult learning in China. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 13(3), 450-464.
Marengo, A., Pagano, A., Pange, J., & Soomro, K.A. (2024). The educational value of artificial intelligence in higher education: A 10-year systematic literature review. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(4), 625-644.
Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. (2019). Higher education act B.E. 2019. Bangkok: Shipping and Parcel Printing Houses.
Parkatti, A., Saari, T., Tammelin, M., & Villi, M. (2022). Framing digital competence in media work – The case of Finland. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 42(13/14), 15-29.
Phakamach, P. (2023). Educational innovation: Elements and mechanisms for the development of Thai educational institutions towards internationalization. Journal of Education and Innovative Learning, 3(2), 161-180.
Phakamach, P., Panjarattanakorn, D., & Onsampant, S. (2023). Conceptualization and development of digital leadership to drive corporate digital transformation for sustainable success. International Journal of Educational Communications and Technology, 3(2), 27-39.
Phakamach, P., Senarith, P., & Wachirawongpaisarn, S. (2022). The metaverse in education: The future of immersive teaching & learning. RICE Journal of Creative Entrepreneurship and Management, 3(2), 75-88.
Reddy, P., Sharma, B., Chaudhary, K., Lolohea, B., & Tamath, R. (2022). Information literacy: A desideratum of the 21st century. Online Information Review, 46(3), 441-463.
Routray, R., & Khandelwal, K. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption: Do Generation Z students feel technostress in deploying AI for completing courses of study at universities?. Asian Education and Development Studies, 13(5), 534-545.
Saib, M.O., Rajkoomar, M., Naicker, N., & Olugbara, C.T. (2023). Digital pedagogies for librarians in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Information Discovery and Delivery, 51(1), 13-25.
Yadav, A.K.S. (2022). The essential skills and competencies of LIS professionals in the digital age: Alumni perspectives survey. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 71(8/9), 837-856.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Innovation in Administration and Educational Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.