MICROLEARNING FOR EDUCATIONAL EQUITY: BRIDGING LEARNING GAPS FOR LEARNERS IN REMOTE AREAS

ผู้แต่ง

  • Thaphat Khota Ban na ko School, Loei Primary Educational Service Area Office 2
  • Tirdthun Prueprang Ban na ko School, Loei Primary Educational Service Area Office 2, Thailand
  • Pratan Phisngam Ban na ko School, Loei Primary Educational Service Area Office 2, Thailand
  • Manatsaree Ritthidech Ban na ko School, Loei Primary Educational Service Area Office 2, Thailand
  • Nilrat Kota Faculty of Education and Human development, Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64186/jsp2785%20%20

คำสำคัญ:

Microlearning , Rural Education, Digital Divide , Mobile Learning, Learning Gaps

บทคัดย่อ

       Deep-rooted educational inequality remains a major challenge in Thailand's remote and rural areas. Against this backdrop, this academic article explores the potential of Microlearning, or modularized learning, as an educational innovation that could help bridge existing learning disparities. Employing a systematic literature review methodology, the article synthesizes theoretical principles, evidence from applied case studies, and practical insights to demonstrate that concise, accessible, and mobile-based learning content directly aligns with the needs, lifestyles, and constraints of learners in remote contexts. This article connects the concept of Microlearning with established educational and psychological theories to explain its potential to enhance learning effectiveness. Drawing from Cognitive Load Theory and Self-Determination Theory, the study highlights the cognitive and motivational mechanisms underlying Microlearning's success. The findings suggest that Microlearning, when contextually adapted, can enhance learner motivation, autonomy, and retention. In addition, the article proposes a practical framework for implementing Microlearning that integrates contextually relevant content design, accessible technology, strategies for assessment and feedback, and a redefined role for facilitators. It also identifies possible challenges and provides policy recommendations for educators and government agencies. Ultimately, this article proposes Microlearning not only as a technological innovation but also as a human-centered approach to achieving long-term educational transformation.

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Aljohani, M. (2017). Principles of “constructivism” in foreign language teaching. Journal of Literature and Arts, 8(9), 1256–1269.

Alias, N. F., & Razak, R. (2024). Revolutionizing learning in the digital age: A systematic literature review of microlearning strategies. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2331638

Bhamani, S., Makhdoom, A., Bharuchi, V., Ali, N., Kaleem, S., & Ahmed, D. (2020). Home learning in times of COVID: Experiences of parents. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 7(1), 9–26.

De Gagne, J. C., Park, H. K., Hall, K., Woodward, A., & Yamane, S. (2019). Microlearning in health professions education: A scoping review. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 17(12), 2505–2535.

Gandhi, R., Veeraraghavan, R., Toyama, K., & Ramprasad, V. (2009). Digital Green: Participatory video for agricultural extension. Information Technologies & International Development, 5(1), 1–15.

Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002

Henderson, M., Finger, G., & Renc, P. (2018). Contextually relevant learning: The development of a pedagogical framework for mobile learning. In Mobile learning in higher education (pp. 55–72). Springer.

Jantakoon, T., & Teo, T. M. H. (2022). Digital divide in Thailand: A systematic review of policy and research. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 21(3), 391–417.

Jomah, O., Masoud, A. K., & Kishore, X. P. (2016). Micro learning: A modernized education system. BRAIN: Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 7(1), 103–110.

Kang, S. H. K. (2016). Spaced repetition promotes efficient and durable learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22(3), 249–262.

Leong, K., Sung, A., Au, D., & Blanchard, C. (2020). A review of the trend of microlearning. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 13(1), 88–102.

Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Mohammed, G. S., Wakil, K., & Nawroly, S. S. (2018). The effectiveness of microlearning to improve students’ learning ability. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(3), 32–38.

Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Mobile-based assessment: A literature review of publications in major refereed journals from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 125, 101–119.

OECD. (2021). The state of global education: 18 months into the pandemic. OECD Publishing.

Pitsuwan, P., & Thongthew, S. (2021). Educational inequality in Thailand: The gap between urban and rural areas. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 42(2), 336–343.

Rujopakarn, W. (2019). Socio-economic factors affecting educational outcomes in rural Thailand. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research in Asia, 25(2), 1–17.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.

Siemens, G., & Gasevic, D. (2012). Guest editorial: Learning and knowledge analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 1–2.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292.

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575.

Wu, T. T., Chen, Y. I., & Chen, C. M. (2021). The effect of QR code-based ubiquitous learning on student learning outcomes and motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(7), 1279–1305.

Yu, Z., Jia, G., & Wang, Y. (2022). An offline-first approach for mobile learning in remote and rural areas. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 14(1), 1–16.

Zhang, J. (2022). Leveraging familiar social media for educational purposes: A case study of WeChat. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 15(1), 5.

Zhou, L., & Tang, H. (2022). The changing role of teachers in the digital era: From knowledge transmitters to learning facilitators. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2541–2561.

Zurovac, D., Larson, B. A., Sudoi, R. K., & Snow, R. W. (2011). The impact of mobile phone-based training on the performance of community health workers in Kenya. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 85(3), 508–515. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2011.11-0164

ดาวน์โหลด

เผยแพร่แล้ว

07-12-2025

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง

Khota, T., Prueprang, T., Phisngam, P., Ritthidech, M. ., & Kota, N. . (2025). MICROLEARNING FOR EDUCATIONAL EQUITY: BRIDGING LEARNING GAPS FOR LEARNERS IN REMOTE AREAS . วารสารสังคมศึกษาปริทรรศน์, 2(1), 14 หน้า. https://doi.org/10.64186/jsp2785