Integrating Buddhist Principles into the Restorative Justice Process to Foster Fairness in Thai Society

Main Article Content

Phrakhru Soonthonprasitthidham

Abstract

This academic article aims to: 1) examine the concept of restorative justice; 2) analyze Buddhist principles that can be applied to promote justice; and 3) propose an approach for integrating Buddhist principles with restorative justice in Thai society. The study employed a documentary research methodology based on the analysis and synthesis of concepts, theories, Buddhist principles, and relevant academic literature. Modern justice systems are no longer concerned solely with identifying offenders and imposing punishment but also emphasize victim healing, relationship restoration, and the promotion of social harmony. Restorative justice is therefore recognized as an important approach to justice that emphasizes the participation of victims, offenders, and communities in addressing the harm caused by wrongdoing. Its application in the Thai context, however, should take into account the country's cultural foundations and ethical values, particularly Buddhist principles, which have long been closely associated with Thai society and ways of life.


The findings reveal that the Buddhist principles of the Four Sublime States of Mind (Brahmavihāra), the Four Bases of Social Solidarity (Saṅgahavatthu), the Four Noble Truths (Ariyasaṅ), and loving-kindness and compassion can be systematically integrated into restorative justice processes. The Four Sublime States of Mind promote attitudes of loving-kindness, compassion, understanding, and the reduction of retaliatory tendencies among stakeholders. The Four Bases of Social Solidarity facilitate communication, relationship-building, and cooperation among the parties involved. The Four Noble Truths provide a framework for analyzing problems, identifying the underlying causes of conflict, and developing appropriate solutions. Loving-kindness and compassion further contribute to psychological healing, forgiveness, and the restoration of relationships among victims, offenders, and communities. Collectively, these principles support a justice process that emphasizes the restoration of harm alongside the promotion of reconciliation and social harmony.


The new body of knowledge derived from this study is the “B-R-J Model (Buddhist Restorative Justice Model),” an integrative framework that combines Buddhist principles with restorative justice. The model consists of four key components: 1) Buddhist Mindset, which involves cultivating awareness grounded in loving-kindness, compassion, and understanding; 2) Restorative Dialogue, which emphasizes communication and dialogue to foster mutual understanding, acknowledgment of harm, and forgiveness; 3) Justice Restoration, which focuses on the restoration and healing of victims, offenders, and communities; and 4) Social Harmony, which aims to promote reconciliation, social peace, and sustainable justice. The B-R-J Model provides a conceptual framework for applying Buddhist principles to the development of restorative justice in ways that are responsive to the social and cultural context of Thailand.

Article Details

How to Cite
Phrakhru Soonthon, P. S. (2026). Integrating Buddhist Principles into the Restorative Justice Process to Foster Fairness in Thai Society. Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Science and Justice Administration, 2(3), 93–108. retrieved from https://so11.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JISSJA/article/view/4004
Section
Academic Article

References

กรมคุมประพฤติ. (2565). แนวทางการดำเนินงานยุติธรรมเชิงสมานฉันท์ในประเทศไทย. กระทรวงยุติธรรม. กุศลจิต.

พระธรรมปิฎก (ป.อ. ปยุตฺโต). (2546). พุทธธรรม. มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย.

พระพรหมคุณาภรณ์ (ป.อ. ปยุตฺโต). (2556). พจนานุกรมพุทธศาสตร์ ฉบับประมวลธรรม. ผลิธัมม์.

พระพรหมคุณาภรณ์ (ป.อ. ปยุตฺโต). (2559). พจนานุกรมพุทธศาสตร์ ฉบับประมวลธรรม. มูลนิธิธรรมทาน.

มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย. (2539). พระไตรปิฎกภาษาไทย ฉบับมหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย. มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย.

สำนักงานกิจการยุติธรรม. (2564). กระบวนการยุติธรรมเชิงสมานฉันท์กับการสร้างความเป็นธรรมในสังคมไทย. กระทรวงยุติธรรม.

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.

Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press.

Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as property. British Journal of Criminology, 17(1), 1–15.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Pretty, J. N. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development, 23(8), 1247–1263.

Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: SAGE Publications.

Wachtel, T. (2016). Defining Restorative. Bethlehem, PA: International Institute for Restorative Practices.

Zehr, H. (2002). The Little Book of Restorative Justice. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.