EFFECTS OF THE DEEP DESIGN THINKING MODEL WITH CHATGPT ON WRITING SKILLS AND ANXIETY AMONG THAI EFL STUDENTS
คำสำคัญ:
DEEP Design thinking model, ChatGPT, Writing skills, Writing anxietyบทคัดย่อ
This study employed a quasi-experimental one-group pretest–posttest design to examine the effects of the DEEP Design Thinking Model combined with ChatGPT on English writing skills and writing anxiety among Thai EFL students. The sample consisted of 38 Matthayomsuksa 5/4 students from Ayutthayanusorn School in the first semester of the 2025 academic year, selected through cluster sampling. The research instruments included lesson plans, an English writing skills test, and a writing anxiety questionnaire. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, dependent samples t-test, and effect size (Cohen’s d).
The results indicated that students’ writing skills significantly improved after the intervention (t = -14.97, p < 0.05, d = 1.34). In addition, writing anxiety significantly decreased from a high to a moderate level (t = 27.51, p < 0.05, d = 1.46). However, the use of a one-group design may limit causal interpretation due to potential threats to internal validity, including history, maturation, and testing effects.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Abubakar, S., Jeilani, A., & Yusuf, M. (2025). The Role of Over-Reliance on AI in the Negative Consequences of Student Learning: The Moderating Effects of Ethical Concerns and Institutional Policies. Cogent Education, 12(1), 1-15.
Alanazi, S. M., Elmotri, B., Khamis, G. S., & Darem, A. A. (2025). Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT’s automated corrective feedback in enhancing students’ writing proficiency. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 12(2), 205–214.
Anandhavalli, M. (2017). DEEP design thinking as a strategy for innovation management. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 2(8), 45–50.
Cantwell, M. (2013). Why DEEPdt as a design thinking process? DEEP Design Thinking. Retrieved March 18, 2026, from https://www.deepdesignthinking.com/deep-design-thinking/whydeepdt-as-a-design-hinking-process
Cantwell, M. (2017). 1 Pager #DEEPdt Dash. Retrieved March 18, 2026, from https://www.deepdesignthinking.com/deep-design-thinking/1-pager-deepdt-dash
Cheng, Y. S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 313–335.
Daud, A., Aulia, A. F., Muryanti, Harfal, Z., Nabilla, O., & Ali, H. S. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence into English language teaching: A systematic review. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 677–691.
Eragamreddy, N. M. (2024). The Impact of AI in Creating Writing Skills in English Language Learners. International Journal of Social Science Humanity & Management Research, 3(12), 1573–1586.
Faksang, C. (2020). A development of critical writing skills using feedback model approach for 11th grade high school students. Journal of Education Silpakorn University, 18(2), 110-122.
Hawanti, S., & Zubaydulloevna, K. M. (2023). AI chatbot-based learning: Alleviating students’ anxiety in English writing classroom. Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application, 7(2), 182–192.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.
Huang, W., Hew, K. F., & Fryer, L. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning: Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 237–257.
Mun, C. Y. (2024). EFL learners’ English writing feedback and their perception of using ChatGPT. Journal of English Teaching through Movies and Media, 25(2), 26-39.
Nguyen, T. C. (2023). University teachers’ perceptions of using ChatGPT in language teaching and assessment. Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference, 4, 116–128.
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2008). Basic education core curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D.2008). Bangkok: Office of the Basic Education Commission, Ministry of Education.
_______. (2025). Guidelines for using AI for teachers, students, schools, and parents in Thailand (B.E.2568). Bangkok: Office of the Basic Education Commission, Ministry of Education.
Phosa, S. (2020). Enhancing L2 learners’ English writing proficiency through blended learning: A case study of Thai undergraduate students. Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 18(2), 193–212.
Pongsukvajchakul, P. (2023). Analysis of Thai EFL university students’ needs in learning English paragraph writing. Journal of Management Sciences, Kasetsart University, 2(2), 44–59.
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 342-363.
Sangnarin, T., Diteeyont, W., & Chaivisit, S. (2025). A study on the effects of integrating generative AI with reflective thinking to enhance advanced essay writing achievement of grade 8 students. Journal of Educational Technology and Communications, Faculty of Education Mahasarakham University, 8(26), 141-151.
Thongmee, A., & Meesri, R. (2019). A comparative study of collaborative writing through small mixed-ability groups to reduce writing anxiety of grade 12 students. An Online Journal of Education, 47(2), 1-14.
Wankong, A. (2016). English teaching in the 21st century. Journal of Yanasangvorn Research Institute Mahamakut Buddhist University, 7(2), 303–314.
Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Students’ Academic Development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343-355.
Zhang, K. (2025). Enhancing Critical Writing Through AI Feedback: A Randomized Control Study. Behavioral Sciences, 15(5), 600-613.
