Adopting Self-Regulated Learning in Writing Instruction Viewed from the Lens of Activity Theory

Authors

Keywords:

self-regulated learning, writing, activity theory

Abstract

This case study investigates the utilization of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) viewed from the activity theory perspective, analyzes the SRL strategies documented in My SRL Diary, explains the contradictions in applying SRL, and explores the students' voices on SRL usage. Forty students and two lecturers from an essay writing class at a state university in Indonesia participated in this study. Data collection included conducting classroom observations, collecting students' writing diaries, and conducting interviews. The findings demonstrate that lecturers integrate SRL stages and activity theory to enhance learning outcomes. My SRL diary helps improve students' self-regulatory skills. Contradictions in Activity Theory offer insights that lead to solutions for enhancing learning experiences while students' voices evaluate SRL implementation. This study improves the grasp of SRL in writing instruction by employing activity theory as a framework. The study explores SRL implementation stages closely and identifies areas for improvement within the contradictions of the Activity Theory framework. Through students' voices, this study provides important insights to guide future research and enhance SRL practices for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners in writing instruction.

Author Biographies

Candradewi Wahyu Anggraeni, Universitas Negeri Semarang

an awardee of Beasiswa Pendidikan Indonesia and a doctoral student of Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia. She is also an Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Universitas Tidar, Indonesia. Her research areas focus on English language teaching, writing, self-regulated learning, and technology-enabled learning.

Januarius Mujiyanto, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Januarius Mujiyanto is a Professor at the Faculty of Language and Arts, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia. His research interests are applied linguistics, translation studies, and language philosophy.

Katharina Rustipa, Universitas Stikubank Semarang

a Professor at the Faculty of Law and Language, Universitas Stikubank Semarang, Indonesia. Her research interest is in applied linguistics.

Widhiyanto Widhiyanto, Universitas Negeri Semarang

an Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Language and Arts, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia. His research interests include academic writing and systemic functional linguistics

References

Abadikhah, S., Aliyan, Z., & Talebi, S. H. (2018). EFL students’ attitudes towards self-regulated learning strategies in academic writing. Issues in Educational Research, 28(1), 1-17. http://www.iier.org.au/iier28/abadikhah.pdf

Altikriti, S. (2022). Challenges facing Jordanian undergraduates in writing graduation research paper. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 58-67. https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/3110/953

Anggoro, K. J., & Pratiwi, D. I. (2023). Fostering self-assessment in English learning with a generative AI platform: A case of Quizziz AI. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 14(4), 489–501. https://doi.org/10.37237/140406

Anggraeni, C. W., Mujiyanto, J., Rustipa, K., & Widhiyanto , W. (2022a). Problematika dan solusi dalam penulisan akademik pada mata kuliah professional writing: Persepsi mahasiswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana UNNES, 5(1), 208-214. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/snpasca/article/view/1452/952

Anggraeni, C. W., Mujiyanto, J., Rustipa, K., & Widhiyanto , W. (2022b). The virtues of self-regulated learning strategy in writing: A scoping review. International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology, 8(1), 964–968. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/ISET/article/view/1865

Asaad, H. Q. M., & Shabdin, A. A. (2021). The predictive role of morphological awareness and productive vocabulary knowledge in L2 postgraduate students’ academic writing. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911149

Asadnia, F., Atai, M. R., Karimi, M. N. (2022). “I am coming out of my research shell …”: Exploring Iranian University English Teachers’ Research Engagement through Activity Theory. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 19(2), 592-608. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.2.12.592

Blayone, T. J. B. (2019): Theorising effective uses of digital technology with activity theory, Technology. Pedagogy and Education, 28(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1645728

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chen, Z., Chen, W., Jia, J., & Le, H. (2022). Exploring AWE-supported writing process: An activity theory perspective. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10125/73482

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed). Routledge.

Cook-Sather, A. (2019). Student voice across contexts: fostering student agency in today’s schools. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 182-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1705091

Engeström,Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit.

Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of Activity Theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge University Press.

Engeström,Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press.

Eslami, M., & Sahragard, R. (2021). Investigating the effect of self-regulatory strategy development on Iranian EFL learners’ metadiscoursal writing skills. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 21, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2021.21.04

Fitriati, S. W., Wijayatiningsih, T. D., Farida, A. N., & Hapsari, C. T. (2023). Model of self-regulated strategies in a project-based blended synchronous learning in writing class for English language students at a university level. UNNES Press.

Johnston, O., Wildy, H. & Shand, J. (2021). Projecting student voice by constructing grounded theory. The Australian Educational Researcher. 48, 543–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-00410-y

Lee, M. (2020). Exploring English writing strategies of Korean university students through activity theory. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 17-44. https:// doi.org/10.25256/PAAL.24.1.2

Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall.

Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Progress Press

Liu, Y. & Chang, C. (2011). Blogging as mediated action in the development of two EFL teachers: An activity theory approach. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 8(4), 25-59.http://journal.asiatefl.org/main/main.php?inx_journals=30&inx_contents=111&main=1&sub=3&submode=3&PageMode=JournalView&s_title=Blogging_as_Mediated_Action_in_the_Development_of_Two_EFL_Teachers_An_Activity_Theory_Approach

Mahmud, Y. S., & German, E. (2021). Online self-regulated learning strategies amid a global pandemic: Insights from Indonesian university students. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.2

Parr, J. & Hawe, E. (2020) Student pedagogic voice in the literacy classroom: a review. Research Papers in Education, 37(6), 773-796. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1864769

Pionera, M., Degeng, I. N. S., Widiati, U., & Setyosari, P. (2020). Instructional methods and self-regulated learning in writing. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1334a

Pullenayegem, J., De Silva, R., & Jayatilleke, G. (2021). Contradictions in learner interactions in a blended-learning writing course: An activity theory analysis. Journal of Learning for Development, 8(2), 327-345. https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/496/639

Robillos, R. J. (2023). The impact of the FlipGrid application within the genre-based framework on students’ writing skills and self-regulation of learning awareness. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 14(4), 456–475. https://doi.org/10.37237/140404

Rustipa, K., Soepriatmadji, L., Purwanto, S., Pukan, E., O. (2022). Students’ doing thematic development and concept map analyses to enhance EFL students’ textual competence. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(8), 2586-2605. https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/10266/6648

Sandra, L. T. E. (2022). L2 writers’ response to and use of teacher feedback: An activity theory perspective. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 19(1), 66-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.1.5.66

Seker, M., & Inan-Karagul, B. (2022). Assisting higher education learners online to acquire self-regulated writing strategies during Covid-19. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 7(1), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.989005

Teng, L. S. (2022). Self-regulated learning and second language writing: Fostering strategic language learners. Springer.

Toprak, Z., & Yücel, V. (2020). A peculiar practice of academic writing: Epidemic writing in the Turkish graduate education. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1774098

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wachidah, W. D. N. A., Fitriati, S.W., & Widhiyanto, W. (2020). Structures and functions of lexical bundles in findings and discussion sections of graduate students’ thesis. English Education Journal, 10(2), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v10i1.3

Wijaya, K. F. (2021). English education master students’ self-regulated learning strategies in academic writing. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 7(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v7i1.2313

Woottipong, K. (2020). Investigation into Thai high school learners’ self-regulated learning skills, self-efficacy and writing performance. Research in Pedagogy, 10(1), 32-49. https://doi.org/10.5937/istrped2001032W

Xu, J. (2021). Chinese university students’ L2 writing feedback orientation and self-regulated learning writing strategies in online teaching during Covid-19. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00586-6

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Zimmerman, B.J. & Moylan, R. (2009). Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In Hacker, D.J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A.C. Handbook of metacognition in education. Routledge.

Zhu, W., & Mitchell, D. A. (2012). Participation in peer response as activity: An examination of peer response stances from an activity theory perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 362–386. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41576051

Published

05/11/2026

How to Cite

Anggraeni, C. W., Mujiyanto, J., Rustipa, K., & Widhiyanto, W. (2026). Adopting Self-Regulated Learning in Writing Instruction Viewed from the Lens of Activity Theory . PASAA, 71. retrieved from https://so11.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PASAA/article/view/800

Issue

Section

Research articles

Categories