A Competence-Based, Technology-Mediated Speaking Intervention in Vietnamese EFL Classrooms: a Comparative Study of Collaborative and Expert-Novice Dyads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66947/pasaa.v72i1.3172Keywords:
expert-novice dyad, collaborative dyad, CBLT, mobile social networking site, speaking performanceAbstract
This study investigates speaking development during participation in a speaking instructional model combining Competence-Based Language Teaching (CBLT), dyadic interaction, and mobile social networking site (Zalo)-based speaking practice for secondary EFL learners in Vietnam, where students have few opportunities for authentic oral communication despite years of studying English. Two classes of seventy-two Grade 8 learners (36 in each class) participated in a 12-week program. Both classes followed the same CBLT and Zalo-based speaking curriculum but worked in different dyads: collaborative peer pairs or expert–novice pairs with English-major university buddies. Data included pre- and post-speaking tests, focus group interviews, and weekly Zalo speaking recordings. Quantitative results of pre- and post-test scores suggested that the model was associated with significant improvements in grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, and interactive communication for both dyads, with expert–novice dyads showing larger gains in accuracy-related areas. Qualitative data, analyzed via thematic analysis, showed that the three components operated as an interdependent ecology: CBLT provided the pedagogical structure, dyadic interaction functioned as the mechanism for linguistic development, and Zalo served as the low-pressure delivery environment. These findings offer promising evidence regarding the feasibility of this instructional ecology for supporting speaking development in resource-limited contexts.
References
Adeyeye, B., Ojih, S. E., Bello, D., Adesina, E., Yartey, D., Ben-Enukora, C., & Adeyeye, Q. (2022). Online learning platforms and Covenant University students’ academic performance in practical related courses during COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(2), 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020878
Akkara, S., Anumula, V., & Mallampalli, M. (2020). Impact of WhatsApp interaction on improving L2 speaking skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(3), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i03.11534
Avci, H., & Adiguzel, T. (2017). A case study on mobile-blended collaborative learning in an English as a foreign language context. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3261
Boahin, P., & Hofman, W. H. A. (2014). Perceived effects of competency-based training on the acquisition of professional skills. International Journal of Educational Development, 36, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2013.11.003
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
Bui, T. T. N., & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2016). Standardizing English for educational and socio-economic betterment: A critical analysis of English language policy reforms in Vietnam. In R. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English language education policy in Asia (pp. 363–388). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22464-0_17
Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475
Chan, S. C., Wan, C. J., & Ko, S. (2019). Interactivity, active collaborative learning, and learning performance: The moderating role of perceived fun by using personal response systems. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.12.004
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Dooly, M., & Sadler, R. (2016). Becoming little scientists: Technologically enhanced project-based language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 54–78. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44446
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Ablex.
Education First. (2024). EF English proficiency index. https://www.ef.com/wwen/epi/
Eltanskaya, E., Arzhanovskaya, A., & Linkova, Y. (2019). Teaching English by means of competence-based approach to the students of secondary vocational education. In Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific Practical Conference: The Individual and Society in the Modern Geopolitical Environment (ISMGE 2019) (pp. 177–181). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/ismge-19.2019.35
Fouz-González, J. (2017). Pronunciation instruction through Twitter: The case of commonly mispronounced words. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 631–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1340309
Ha, V. X., Tran, N. G., & Tran, N. H. (2021). Teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding assessment in EFL classrooms in Vietnam. The Qualitative Report, 26(11), 3457–3475. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5063
Han, T., & Keskin, F. (2016). Using a mobile application (WhatsApp) to reduce EFL speaking anxiety. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 12, 29–50. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.243
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue among Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086288
Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1–26). Oxford University Press.
Le, V. C. (2011). Form-focused instruction: A case study of Vietnamese teachers’ beliefs and practices (Doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato).
Lin, C.-H. (2012). Language learning through social networks: Perceptions and reality (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine).
López-Medina, E. F., & Casado, J. M. (2024). CLIL as a competence-based strategy against foreign language anxiety. Discover Psychology, 4(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-024-00187-6
Mao, J. (2014). Social media for learning: A mixed methods study on high school students’ technology affordances and perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 213-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.002
McDonough, K. (2004). Learner–learner interaction during pair and small-group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.003
Nguyen, G. V. (2013). Orienting to pedagogical innovation: A case study of Vietnamese teachers’ beliefs and practices (Doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato).
Nguyen, V. (2022). Vietnamese university EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices: A cultural historical activity theory analysis (Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington). https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.19492178
Ohta, A. S. (2001). Peer interactive tasks and assisted performance in classroom language learning. In A. S. Ohta (Ed.), Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese (pp. 73–128). Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604712-9
Pambudi, N., Syam, H., Rustam, U., Dewi, R. A. P. K., & Amir, H. S. (2024). The effect of a competency-based learning approach on improving English speaking skills. International Journal of Language and Ubiquitous Learning, 2(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijlul.v2i1.753
Peterson, M. (2012). Learner interaction in an MMORPG: A sociocultural discourse analysis. ReCALL, 24(3), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000195
Phan, D. Q. T. (2021). Vietnamese EFL teachers’ experiences of the new English curriculum (Doctoral dissertation, UNSW Sydney). https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/2262
Philp, J., Walter, S., & Basturkmen, H. (2010). Peer interaction in the foreign language classroom: What factors foster a focus on form? Language Awareness, 19(4), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.516831
Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371–2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024532
Saint, M. (2021). Development of a curriculum based on content and language integrated learning and competency-based education for enhancing business English writing ability of undergraduate students (Doctoral dissertation, Chulalongkorn University). https://doi.org/10.58837/chula.the.2021.123
Shih, R.-C., Lee, C., & Cheng, T.-F. (2015). Effects of English spelling learning experience through a mobile LINE app for college students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2634–2638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.945
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179
Storch, N. (2004). Using activity theory to explain differences in patterns of dyadic interactions in an ESL class. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60(4), 457–480. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.60.4.457
Sun, Y.-C., & Yang, F.-Y. (2015). I help, therefore I learn: Service learning on Web 2.0 in an EFL speaking class. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(3), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.818555
Sundkvist, P., & Nguyen, X. N. C. M. (2020). English in Vietnam. In K. Bolton, A. Kirkpatrick, & J. Lee (Eds.), The handbook of Asian Englishes (pp. 683–703). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118791882.ch30
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford University Press.
Thao, L. T., & Mai, L. X. (2022). English language teaching reforms in Vietnam. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1846041
Tian, L., & Jiang, Y. (2021). L2 proficiency pairing, task type and L1 use: A mixed-methods study on optimal pairing in dyadic task-based peer interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 699774. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.699774
Van, V. H. (2010). The current situation and issues in the teaching of English in Vietnam. Ritsumeikan Language and Culture Research, 22(1), 7–18.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Walls, L. C. (2018). The effect of dyad type on collaboration: Interactions among heritage and second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 51(3), 638–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12356
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168806070745
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Xodabande, I. (2017). The effectiveness of social media network Telegram in teaching English language pronunciation to Iranian EFL learners. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1347081. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1347081
Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00136
Yen, Y.-C., Hou, H.-T., & Chang, K. E. (2015). Applying role-playing strategy to enhance learners’ writing and speaking skills in EFL courses using Facebook and Skype as learning tools: A case study in Taiwan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(5), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.839568
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 PASAA: A Journal of Language Teaching and Learning

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


