Figural Representations on Theory of Mathematical Representations: Operational Diagram and Ways to See

Main Article Content

Masami Isoda

บทคัดย่อ

In this article, the Theory of Mathematical Representation (Isoda, 1990) was applied to distinguish different types of pictures, drawings, and figures that can be regarded as mathematical representations, alongside algebraic and other forms of representation. To clarify the unique interpretation of written mathematical representation, Isoda defined its nature in terms of context/objective, focused symbol, and focused operation. And to explain ‘focus,’ the ways to see is explained by using Curriculum Framework to develop mathematical thinking (Isoda, Teh, Gan, 2024)). Using this framework, some figural representations can also be recognized as a form of mathematical representation when used as tools for thinking. This perspective highlights the necessity of teaching figural representations in Japanese origin mathematics textbooks (Isoda & Maitree, 2013), not merely as explanatory tools used by teachers on an ad hoc basis, but as essential thinking tools for students’ future learning.

Article Details

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
Isoda, M. (2026). Figural Representations on Theory of Mathematical Representations: Operational Diagram and Ways to See . วารสารสมาคมคณิตศาสตรศึกษา (ประเทศไทย), 1(1), # 29 – 52. สืบค้น จาก https://so11.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JTSMEd/article/view/4264
ประเภทบทความ
บทความวิชาการ

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Apollonius de Peruga, Edmundi Halleii edited. (1710). Theatro Sheldoniano.

Atkin, A. (2023). Peirce’s Theory of Signs, in Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman eds. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2023 Edition

https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/peirce-semiotics/

Euclid. (1537). Euclidis Megarensis mathematici clarissimi Elementorum geometricorum. lib. XV. : cum expositione Theonis in priores XIII à Bartholomæo Veneto latinitate donata, Campani in omnes, & Hypsiclis Alexandrini in duos postremos. His adiecta sunt Phænomena, Catoptrica & Optica, deinde Protheoria Marini & Data, Postremûm uero, opuschulum de leui & ponderoso, hactenus non uisum, eiusdem autoris. Iohannem Heruagium.

Freudenthal, H. (1972). Mathematics as an Educational Task. D. Reidel.

Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. D. Reidel.

Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning.1 (2), 155-177.

García, J., Dolores, C. (2021). Pre-university students’ mathematical connections when sketching the graph of derivative and antiderivative functions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00286-x

Haga, K. (2007). Origamics: Mathematical Explorations Through Paper Folding (Fonacier, J. C & Isoda, M. translated). World Scientific.

Inprasitha, M., Isoda, M., Araya, Ro. (2023). Mathematical Literacy for Digital Era: Review of Mathematical Thinking and Computational Thinking for Curriculum Development. East and West Journal of Mathematics. 24(2). 137-155.

Isoda, M. (1990).数学化における言語の再構成過程に関する一考察 : 数学的表現からみた分割数の授業の分析II. 数学教育論文発表会論文集. 23. 19-24

礒田正美. (1993). 学習過程における表現と意味の生成に関する一考察. 三輪辰郎先生退官記念論文集編集委員会編.数学教育学の進歩.東京:東洋館出版社.108-125.

Isoda, M., Murata, A. (2011). Study with your friends, mathematics for elementary school, 4th grade, v. 2. Gakkotosyo Co.Lted.

Isoda, M. & Inprasitha, M. (2013). เรียนคณิตศาสตร์กับเพื่อนๆ คณิตศาสตร์สำหรับระดับชั้นประถมศึกษา,

เรียนคณิตศาสตร์กับเพื่อนๆ : คณิตศาสตร์สำหรับระดับชั้นประถมศึกษา

แปลและเรียบเรียง, ไมตรี อินทร์ประสิทธิ์ ; ที่ปรึกษา, มะซะมิ อิโซะดะ (Masami Isoda) ; [ผู้แปลและเรียบเรียง, ไมตรี อินทร์ประสิทธิ์ และนายอรรค อินทร์ประสิทธิ์]

Isoda, M. (2015). Mathematization for Mathematics Education算数・数学教育における数学的活動による学習過程の構成. 共立出版

Isoda, M. (2018). Mathematization: A Theory for Mathematics Curriculum Design. In M.Kawazoe (Ed.) International Workshop on Mathematics Education for Non-Mathematics Students Developing Advanced Mathematical Literacy at Tokyo, Japan. 27-34.

Isoda, M. & Olfos, R. (2021). Teaching Multiplication with Lesson Study. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28561-6

Isoda, M., Teh, K.H., Gan, T.H. (2024). SEAMEO Basic Education Standards (SEA-BES): Common Core Regional Learning Standards (CCRLS) in Mathematics for Primary and Lower Secondary Levels, Second Edition. SEAMEO-RECSAM. https://www.criced.tsukuba.ac.jp/pdf/SEA-BES_CCRLS_in_Mathematics_Second_Edition.pdf

Jiǔ Zhāng Suàn Shù, 1st century BC–2nd century AD; Liu Hui edition, 263 AD) and Sun Tzu’s Mathematical Classic (Sunzi Suanjing, 5th–6th century AD)

Jochi, S. (2015). Cranes and Tortoises type problems.

https://mathinfo.criced.tsukuba.ac.jp/museum/wisdom_of_math/copy_of_ppt_Jochi2

pdf

Liu Hui edition (1975). Jiǔ Zhāng Suàn Shù (劉徽,李淳風注釋 九章算術. 商務印書館)

Ministry of Education (1636). Elementary School Mathematics, G2.v1. (尋常小学算術. 東京書籍).

Ministry of Education (1937). Elementary School Mathematics, G3. v2. (尋常小学算術. 文部省)

Ministry of Education (1939). Elementary School Mathematics, G5. v1. (尋常小学算術. 文部省)

Ministry of Education (1939). Elementary School Mathematics, G5. v2. (尋常小学算術. 文部省)

Ministry of Education (1940). Elementary School Mathematics, G6. v2. (尋常小学算術. 文部省)

Piaget, J. (1972). L' Épistémologie Génétique. Collection Que sais-je 519. Presses Universitaires de France

Polya, G. (1945). How to Solve it. NJ: Princeton University Press

Polya, G. (1975) Sunzi Suanjing. (孫子算經. 商務印書館)

Polya, G. (1975). Zhōu bì suàn jīng (周髀算經. 趙君卿注.商務印書館)

Saengpun, J. and Inprasitha, M. (2012) Development of a Child’s Semiotic Activity with the Help of Psychological Tools: A Vygotsky’s Cultural-Historical Perspective. Psychology, 3, 424-427. doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.35060.

Stingler, L. E. (2002). Fibonacci’s Liber Abaci: A Translation into Modern English of Leonardo

Pisano’s Book of Calculation. Springer.

Tatebe, K. (1690). Sangaku keimou genkai Taisei. 算学啓蒙諺解大成

https://kokusho.nijl.ac.jp/biblio/100307114/100?ln=ja

Tall, D. (2013). How Humans Learn to Think Mathematically. Cambridge University Press.