TLSOA as an Innovative Idea for a School-based Professional Learning Community

Main Article Content

Maitree Inprasitha

Abstract

This article presents the development and theoretical framework of TLSOA (Transformative Lesson Study incorporating Open Approach), an innovative model for establishing a school-based professional learning community. The framework is grounded in historical analysis and longitudinal research on the transformation of two Japanese educational innovations—Lesson Study and the Open-ended Approach—to the Thai educational context. The article argues that meaningful educational reform requires a close integration of the theoretical domain—including learning philosophy and learning theories—with the practical domain, encompassing educational approaches and classroom practices. Rather than directly transferring or replicating educational practices from one context to another, sustainable reform depends on the continuous development and refinement of innovative ideas that are responsive to the cultural and educational context of each country.


The article traces the historical development of Lesson Study, which originated in Japan in 1872 and gradually evolved into a collaborative professional culture among teachers. Since its introduction to Thailand in 1999, Lesson Study has been adapted to address the problem of teachers working in isolation, through a collaborative weekly cycle consisting of Co-Plan, Co-Do, and Co-See. This cycle has been implemented alongside the Open Approach, which promotes students' mathematical thinking through open-ended problems, encourages learners to construct their own mathematical ideas, and redefines teachers' roles from knowledge transmitters to facilitators and co-learners. Continuous implementation has transformed teachers' beliefs about students' mathematical potential and has led to the expansion of the approach from individual schools to school networks and nationwide teacher development initiatives.


The TLSOA framework integrates the three phases of Lesson Study with the four instructional phases of the Open Approach, using Open Class as a shared learning space for teachers, school administrators, preservice teachers, parents, and local communities to foster a school-based professional learning community. Developed, implemented, and refined through more than two decades of research and practice, TLSOA has demonstrated its applicability within the Thai educational context. The article concludes that the success of TLSOA lies not in replicating Japanese practices but in synthesizing and transforming their underlying innovative ideas to suit Thailand's educational context. By establishing a continuous cycle of collaborative learning and professional development, TLSOA provides a sustainable foundation for teacher professional development, the promotion of students' mathematical thinking, and the long-term improvement of educational quality in Thailand.

Article Details

How to Cite
Inprasitha, M. (2026). TLSOA as an Innovative Idea for a School-based Professional Learning Community. Journal of Thailand Society of Mathematics Education, 1(1), # 29 – 40. retrieved from https://so11.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JTSMEd/article/view/4001
Section
Academic Articles

References

ราชกิจจานุเบกษา. (2562). พระราชบัญญัติพื้นที่นวัตกรรมการศึกษา พ.ศ. 2562. เล่ม 136 ตอนที่ 33ก. หน้า 1-25.

ไมตรี อินทร์ประสิทธิ์. (2543). การพัฒนาการเรียนรู้คณิตศาสตร์โดยใช้ปัญหาปลายเปิด. วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์

มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น, 23(3), 1-15.

ไมตรี อินทร์ประสิทธิ์. (2569). การเปิดชั้นเรียน (Open Class): หัวใจของโมเดลเชิงนวัตกรรมการศึกษาชั้นเรียนด้วย

วิธีการแบบเปิด (TLSOA) ในระบบการพัฒนาวิชาชีพ [บรรยายพิเศษ]. เอกสารประกอบการประชุม

วิชาการระดับชาติด้านคณิตศาสตรศึกษา ครั้งที่ 12. สมาคมคณิตศาสตรศึกษา (ประเทศไทย), 21–22 กุมภาพันธ์ 2569, มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏภูเก็ต จังหวัดภูเก็ต.

Baba, T. (2007). Japanese education and Lesson Study: An overview. In M. Isoda, M. Stephens,

Y. Ohara, & T. Miyakawa (Eds.), Japanese Lesson Study in mathematics: Its impact,

diversity and potential for educational improvement (pp. 2-7). World Scientific.

Flavell, J. H. (1963). The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. D. Van Nostrand Company.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.

Inprasitha, M. (1999). Classroom environment in relation to mathematical learning through

open approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematical

Education into the 21st Century: Social Challenges, Issues and Approaches

(pp. 119-123). Cairo, Egypt.

Inprasitha, M. (2003). Reforming of classroom learning: From traditional to new culture of

learning by using open-approach method in teaching mathematics in Thailand. In

Proceedings of the International Conference on Education (pp. 83-93). Khon Kaen,

Thailand.

Inprasitha, M. (2006). Open-ended approach and teacher education. Tsukuba Journal of

Educational Study in Mathematics, 25, 169-177.

Inprasitha, M. (2011). One feature of adaptive lesson study in Thailand: Designing learning unit.

In L. C. Hart, A. S. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson Study research and practice in

mathematics education: Learning together (pp. 101-114). Springer.

Inprasitha, M. (2015). New model of teacher education program for elementary school

mathematics teachers in Thailand emphasizing Lesson Study and Open Approach. In

M. Inprasitha, M. Isoda, P. Wang-Iverson, & B. H. Yeap (Eds.), Lesson Study: Challenges

in mathematics education (pp. 99-108). World Scientific.

Inprasitha, M., Isoda, M., Wang-Iverson, P., & Yeap, B. H. (Eds.). (2014). Lesson Study: Challenges

in mathematics education. World Scientific.

Mizoguchi, T., & Shinno, Y. (2018). The historical development of Lesson Study in Japan. In M.

Quaresma, C. Winsløw, S. Clivaz, J. P. da Ponte, A. Ní Shúilleabháin, & A. Takahashi

(Eds.), Mathematics Lesson Study around the world: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 3-18). Springer.

Nohda, N. (1983). Open-ended problems for creative teaching of mathematics [in Japanese].

Journal of Japan Society of Mathematical Education, 65(7), 172-179.

Nohda, N. (1988). Problem solving using "open-ended problems" in mathematics teaching. In

H. Burkhardt, S. Groves, A. Schoenfeld, & K. Stacey (Eds.), Problem solving---A world view (pp. 225-234). University of Nottingham.

Nohda, N. (2000). Teaching by open-approach method in Japanese mathematics classroom. In

T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the

International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 39-53). Hiroshima University.

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.

Shimada, S. (Ed.). (1977). Open-end approach in arithmetic and mathematics: A new proposal

toward teaching improvement [in Japanese]. Mizuumishobo.

Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for

improving education in the classroom. The Free Press.

von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. The Falmer

Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.

Harvard University Press.