Journal of Liberal Arts and Education (Online)

Management of Learning-Conducive Environments in Schools under the Lat Phrao District Office, Bangko

2026-01-06T15:08:50+07:00

This study aimed to 1) examine the level of learning environment management in schools under the Lat Phrao District Office, Bangkok, and 2) compare learning environment management classified by educational qualification and work experience. The sample consisted of 156 teachers in schools under the Lat Phrao District Office, Bangkok, which were selected by referring to the table of Krejcie and Morgan and using proportional sampling. The study instrument was a 5-point rating scale questionnaire on learning environment management with a reliability value of 0.92. The statistics used for data analysis included mean, standard deviation, and independent samples t-test.

The findings revealed that: 1) the overall management of learning-conducive environments was at a high level. Considering each aspect, the academic environment had the highest mean, followed by the administrative environment and the physical environment, respectively. 2) a comparison of environment management by educational qualification showed no significant differences, both overall and by individual aspects. 3) a comparison by work experience also indicated no significant differences, both overall and by individual aspects.

Research Title การบริหารระบบนิเวศการเรียนรู้ของโรงเรียนสังกัดสำนักงานเขตลาดพร้าวกรุงเทพมหานคร

2026-01-06T13:52:18+07:00

การศึกษาครั้งนี้มีวัตถุประสงค์เพื่อ1) ศึกษาการบริหารระบบนิเวศการเรียนรู้ของโรงเรียนสังกัดสำนักงานเขตลาดพร้าว กรุงเทพมหานคร 2) เปรียบเทียบการบริหารระบบนิเวศการเรียนรู้จำแนกตามวิทยฐานะและประสบการณ์ทำงานของครูผู้สอน กลุ่มตัวอย่างประกอบด้วยครูจำนวน 156 คน ซึ่งได้มาจากการสุ่มแบบง่ายตามตารางของเครจซี่และมอร์แกน เครื่องมือที่ใช้คือแบบสอบถามแบบมาตราส่วนประมาณค่า 5 ระดับเกี่ยวกับการบริหารระบบนิเวศการเรียนรู้ จำนวน 4 ด้าน ได้แก่ สภาพแวดล้อมการเรียนรู้ หลักสูตรและกิจกรรมยืดหยุ่น การใช้เทคโนโลยีเพื่อการศึกษา และการสร้างความร่วมมือกับเครือข่ายและชุมชน ที่มีค่าความเชื่อมั่นเท่ากับ 0.96 การวิเคราะห์ข้อมูลใช้ค่าเฉลี่ย ส่วนเบี่ยงเบนมาตรฐาน และการทดสอบค่า t-test

ผลการศึกษาพบว่า การบริหารระบบนิเวศการเรียนรู้ของโรงเรียนรวมอยู่ในระดับมาก ทั้ง 4 ด้าน เมื่อพิจารณารายด้านพบว่า ด้านสภาพแวดล้อมการเรียนรู้มีค่าเฉลี่ยสูงที่สุด รองลงมาคือด้านการใช้เทคโนโลยีเพื่อการศึกษา ด้านหลักสูตรและกิจกรรมยืดหยุ่น และด้านความร่วมมือกับเครือข่ายและชุมชนซึ่งมีค่าเฉลี่ยต่ำที่สุด นอกจากนี้ ผลการเปรียบเทียบการบริหารระบบนิเวศการเรียนรู้จำแนกตามวิทยฐานะและประสบการณ์ทำงานของครูพบว่าไม่มีความแตกต่างกันทั้งในภาพรวมและรายด้าน ผลการศึกษาชี้ให้เห็นถึงความจำเป็นในการส่งเสริมการใช้เทคโนโลยี การสร้างหลักสูตรที่ยืดหยุ่น และการประสานความร่วมมือกับชุมชน เพื่อให้ระบบนิเวศการเรียนรู้ของโรงเรียนเขตลาดพร้าวมีความสมบูรณ์และยั่งยืนยิ่งขึ้น

Research Title THE STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEM OF TEACHERS IN UTCHARALAI SCHOOL CLUSTER CAMPUS OF THE SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL NAKORNSAWAN

2026-01-06T14:07:03+07:00

This study aimed to 1) examine the student support systems used by teachers in primary schools within the Atcharalai School Cluster, under the Nakhon Sawan Secondary Educational Service Area Office, and 2) compare the student support systems of teachers in these primary schools, categorized by gender, educational level, work experience, and school size. The sample consisted of 207 teachers in the 2016 academic year. Data was collected using a 5-level Likert scale questionnaire. Statistical analyses included frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-test, F-test, and Scheffé’ pairwise comparison test.

The research findings revealed that 1) the overall student support system was operating at a very good level. When considering each aspect, it was found that the aspects of knowing students individually, student screening, problem prevention and resolution, and student development and promotion were all operating at a very good level. However, the aspect of student referral was found to be operating at a high level. 2) A comparison showed that the student support system, when categorized by work experience, differed significantly at the .05 statistical level, and when categorized by school size, differed significantly at the .01 statistical level. However, in the aspects of student development and promotion and student referral, when categorized by gender and educational level, no significant differences were found.

INNOVATIVE LEADERSHIP OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AFFECTING THE EDUCATIONAL SUPERVISION OF SCHOOLS UNDER THE LOPBURI SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AREA OFFICE

2026-01-06T14:37:56+07:00

This article aimed to: (1) examine the level of innovative leadership of school administrators under the Lopburi Secondary Educational Service Area Office; (2) examine the level of educational supervision in schools; (3) investigate the relationship between the innovative leadership of school administrators and educational supervision; and (4) examine the effect of innovative leadership of school administrators on educational supervision in schools. The sample consisted of 219 teachers working in schools under the Lopburi Secondary Educational Service Area Office, selected through random sampling. The research instrument was a questionnaire with a reliability coefficient of 0.97. Data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficient, and regression analysis.

The research findings revealed that: 1) the innovative leadership of school administrators, both overall and in each dimension, was at the highest level; 2) the level of educational supervision in schools, both overall and in each dimension, was at the highest level; and 3) the relationship between the innovative leadership of school administrators and educational supervision in schools showed a very high positive correlation. and 4) Innovative leadership, specifically aspect X3 (teamwork and participation), had a B = 0.398 (t = 8.827 and p = .000). Aspect X4 (creating an innovative and technological atmosphere) had a B = 0.209 (t = 5.541 and p = .000). Aspect X1 (vision and strategy for change) had a B = 0.192 (t = 5.804 and p = .000), and aspect X2 (creativity and imagination) had a B = 0.124 (t = 2.841 and p = .005). All four aspects were statistically significant at the 0.05 level, significantly predicting 74.60% of the variance in educational supervision (R = 0.746), respectively.

A THE RELATION SHIP FACTOR AFFECTING VISIONARY LEADERSHIP FOR BASIC SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS LUMPHUN PRIMARY EDUCATIONAL

2026-01-05T10:06:03+07:00

This research aims to 1) to study Change Leaders and Academic leadership Creativity Emotional Intelligence And Visionary Leadership of school Administrators Under the office of Lamphun Primary Educational Service Area 1 2) to Study the Relationship between the Leaders of Change and Academic Leadership Creativity Emotional Intelligence and Visionary Leadership of school Administrators Under the office of Lamphun Primary Educational Service Area 1 3) to Create Predictive Equations caused by change leaders and academic leadership Creative thinking and Emotional intelligence affecting the visionary leadership of school Administrators Under the Office of Lamphun Primary Educational Service Area 1. The Sample size was School Administrators and teachers Under the Office of Lamphun Primary Educational Service Area 1 Academic year 2018, 95% confidence The sample group of 29 school administrators and 295 teachers, totaling 324 by specifying the size of the sample group from Kregsie and Morgan's finished table Then, randomly selected stratified samples and easily randomized by lottery methods Statistics used in data analysis was percentage, arithmetic mean standard deviation Pearson's correlation coefficient and stepwise multiple regression analysis the research instrument was 5-level estimation scale with a reliability of 0.96.

The research found that 1) Analysis results and standard deviations Of the variables of leadership change and academic leadership factors creativity Emotional Intelligence And visionary leadership of school administrators Overall, it was found that was at A high level When considering each aspect, it was found that the highest mean value was the vision-oriented leadership at a high level Followed by transformational leadership of school administrators (Leadership) with a high average 2) Overall, factors with high correlation coefficients was the emotional intelligence factor and the visionary leadership factor variable At a high level (r =. 672) Followed by the relationship between creative factor variables and emotional intelligence variables at a moderate level (r = .529) And the relationship of creative factors and visionary leadership at a moderate level (r = .270) All factors are related to the visionary leadership of school administrators in a positive way. With statistical significance at the level of .01 and 3) Predictive power of factors affecting vision leadership levels of school administrators Under the office of Lamphun Primary Educational Service Area 1 Found that there were variables that could explain the variables that influenced the visionary leadership of school administrators There are 2 elements change leaders and leadership and creative. Which can explain the variation affecting the visionary leadership of school administrators by a total of 97.00 percent (R₂ = 0.978) with statistical significance at .01 level

Perception of Artificial Intelligence for Designing and Creating Research by Students Master of Education Program in Educational Administration Faculty of Liberal Arts Krirk University

2026-01-05T14:50:19+07:00

The objectives of this research were 1) to study the knowledge and usage of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for research design and creation among graduate students and 2) to compare the knowledge and usage of AI for research design and creation among graduate students classified by student ID.The sample consisted of 56 graduate students in the Educational Administration program, Faculty of Education. This sample was obtained through Simple Random Sampling based on the Krejcie and Morgan table. The research instrument was a 5-level rating scale questionnaire designed to measure the knowledge and usage of AI for research design and creation, with an overall reliability coefficient of 0.92. The statistics used were percentage (%), mean ( ) standard deviation (S.D.), and t-test.

The research findings indicated that: 1) The overall knowledge and usage of AI for research design and creation among graduate students were at a high level (mean was at a high level). 2) The comparison of knowledge and usage of AI for research design and creation among graduate students classified by student ID showed no significant difference.

Creative leadership of Administrators Affecting the Quality of Effective Students in Educational Institutions the Nonthaburi Primary Educational Area 2

2026-01-06T13:32:09+07:00

This research aimed to 1) study creative leadership of school administrators, 2) study the quality of students, 3) study the relationship between creative leadership and student quality, and 4) study the effect of creative leadership of school administrators on the quality of students in schools under the Office of Nonthaburi Primary Educational Service Area 2. The research instrument was a 5-point rating scale questionnaire. Part 1 was opinions about creative leadership, with a reliability value of 0.98. Part 2 was opinions about student quality, with a reliability value of 0.96. The sample consisted of 296 administrators and teachers.

The research results found that 1) the level of creative leadership of educational institution administrators was at a high level overall. 2) the level of student quality was at a high level overall. 3) There was a high positive relationship between creative leadership and student quality overall with statistical significance at the .01 level. 4) The creative leadership of educational institution administrators that affected student quality were creativity (β = 0.582, p-value = .000, t = 7.862), teamwork (β = 0.531, p-value = .000, t = 9.500), individual consideration (β = 0.385, p-value = .000, t = 6.735), flexibility and adaptability (β = -0.250, p-value = .000, t = -5.973), and affected student quality in educational institutions. The five factors of creative leadership of school administrators can jointly predict student quality at 91.18 percent with statistical significance at the .01 level.